COMPARING HARRIS WITH CLINTON AGAINST TRUMP
4 August 2024 By Abiodun Kareem Giwa
The polls favored Hillary Clinton in 2016 against Donald Trump, but he defeated Clinton. The polls show Kamala Harris almost tied with Trump after weeks of Biden's weak position, knocking him out in a debate and paving the way for Harris. Both Clinton and Harris are female, but there are significant differences. Clinton was more popular and backed by Barack Obama's presidency, which lacked the negative aspects associated with Biden's. This could impact Harris's campaign.
Trump's unexpected victory over Clinton in 2016 left everyone, including Trump, in shock. Could history be on the brink of repeating itself with Trump potentially defeating another female and seemingly formidable candidate?
Many Americans said that, in 2016, the country was not ready for a female president. Is the country ready now for Harris to be a female leader? Clinton was not a hiding candidate. Unlike Harris, who has not responded to a single reporter's question, she was out answering reporters' questions. Harris follows Biden's path of hiding away. If Obama's administration failed to install Clinton despite its policy successes compared to the failing Biden and Kamala's policy failures, would Americans still carelessly elect Harris?
Many Americans asked in 2016 what Clinton was looking to do in the White House after eight years with her husband as president. This question was the reason many voters developed a lack of interest in Clinton's campaign. Bill Clinton's success as a president would have persuaded voters to allow his wife a chance. Harris's case is totally Clinton's opposite. Harris could have done better in her party's 2020 primary election as a presidential candidate, but she came last. The report says that Biden picked her as a vice-presidential candidate because she was black. Did her color pave the way for Biden's success in the elections? Certainly not.
We all can remember the lies by some so-called former service generals packaged to give Biden success at the debate in which they said the Hunter computer was a Russian election interference. This incident, which was later proven to be disinformation, was used by the liberal media, as the Democratic Party's propaganda, to discredit Trump's campaign. They told Americans the Hunter computer from hell was disinformation and a lie. Biden won an election on a lie that should have given his opponent the deserved success. He was always in the basement, not answering questions, and the media played the defender role. Americans are witnessing the same pattern all over again with Harris.
Trump primarily won the 2024 election at the July 23 presidential debate with Biden. The Democratic Party and its media saw how Trump floored Biden and began using Biden's age and lack of cognitive ability as the cause and the need for the party to drop him. It is another tactic to take the victory away from Trump and the American public. The party was not over for the Democratic Party and the media. They have also successfully pushed Harris to the front as the party's new nominee. They are trying to distance Harris from Biden and Harris's policy failure with a propaganda of lies. The media report tied her with Trump in the polls.
Can Harris succeed where Clinton failed in the elections? The election is less than 100 days away. The media is a significant problem with America's Democracy, without which Harris will have no place competing with Trump based on policy execution, success, and failure. He defeated both Clinton and the media in 2016. Would Trump repeat it in 2024 to crown his victories in a fight against totalitarianism that Americans have witnessed during this election cycle? The picture of the litigation map against Trump, which included numerous legal challenges, that he fought through and remained on his feet is incredible. He also survived a bullet at a campaign rally and continued fighting.
The Democratic Party and the media have one objective: to stop Trump from getting elected to save Democracy. If they damage Democracy, the result does not matter to them. They label Trump as a danger to Democracy while they look more and more dangerous to Democracy than Trump is. Trump's policies in his first four years in the White House shine like glittering metals under the light against Biden and Harris' dulled policies. Harris has nothing to show. Is lying by a candidate and surrogates an instrument of winning a consequential election? Let us wait and see.
Trump's unexpected victory over Clinton in 2016 left everyone, including Trump, in shock. Could history be on the brink of repeating itself with Trump potentially defeating another female and seemingly formidable candidate?
Many Americans said that, in 2016, the country was not ready for a female president. Is the country ready now for Harris to be a female leader? Clinton was not a hiding candidate. Unlike Harris, who has not responded to a single reporter's question, she was out answering reporters' questions. Harris follows Biden's path of hiding away. If Obama's administration failed to install Clinton despite its policy successes compared to the failing Biden and Kamala's policy failures, would Americans still carelessly elect Harris?
Many Americans asked in 2016 what Clinton was looking to do in the White House after eight years with her husband as president. This question was the reason many voters developed a lack of interest in Clinton's campaign. Bill Clinton's success as a president would have persuaded voters to allow his wife a chance. Harris's case is totally Clinton's opposite. Harris could have done better in her party's 2020 primary election as a presidential candidate, but she came last. The report says that Biden picked her as a vice-presidential candidate because she was black. Did her color pave the way for Biden's success in the elections? Certainly not.
We all can remember the lies by some so-called former service generals packaged to give Biden success at the debate in which they said the Hunter computer was a Russian election interference. This incident, which was later proven to be disinformation, was used by the liberal media, as the Democratic Party's propaganda, to discredit Trump's campaign. They told Americans the Hunter computer from hell was disinformation and a lie. Biden won an election on a lie that should have given his opponent the deserved success. He was always in the basement, not answering questions, and the media played the defender role. Americans are witnessing the same pattern all over again with Harris.
Trump primarily won the 2024 election at the July 23 presidential debate with Biden. The Democratic Party and its media saw how Trump floored Biden and began using Biden's age and lack of cognitive ability as the cause and the need for the party to drop him. It is another tactic to take the victory away from Trump and the American public. The party was not over for the Democratic Party and the media. They have also successfully pushed Harris to the front as the party's new nominee. They are trying to distance Harris from Biden and Harris's policy failure with a propaganda of lies. The media report tied her with Trump in the polls.
Can Harris succeed where Clinton failed in the elections? The election is less than 100 days away. The media is a significant problem with America's Democracy, without which Harris will have no place competing with Trump based on policy execution, success, and failure. He defeated both Clinton and the media in 2016. Would Trump repeat it in 2024 to crown his victories in a fight against totalitarianism that Americans have witnessed during this election cycle? The picture of the litigation map against Trump, which included numerous legal challenges, that he fought through and remained on his feet is incredible. He also survived a bullet at a campaign rally and continued fighting.
The Democratic Party and the media have one objective: to stop Trump from getting elected to save Democracy. If they damage Democracy, the result does not matter to them. They label Trump as a danger to Democracy while they look more and more dangerous to Democracy than Trump is. Trump's policies in his first four years in the White House shine like glittering metals under the light against Biden and Harris' dulled policies. Harris has nothing to show. Is lying by a candidate and surrogates an instrument of winning a consequential election? Let us wait and see.
HTML Comment Box is loading comments...