New York Times and Mrs. Clinton's Aides
November 6 2016 By Abiodun Giwa
Mrs. Clinton
Mrs. Clinton said in a televised news on Saturday she wants to president for all Americans. But news hounds have been questioning the rationale behind a campaign that has virtually all its vital members under one criminal investigation or another.
Before the New York Times' news reports on Saturday, with a question whether if Clinton wins on Tuesday, if she will be going into the Oval Office with what has become a baggage to her campaign, many news reports have highlighted the number of her advisers currently under the FBI's investigation.
Observers say it is a curious question that a friend like the New York Times is in a position to ask a candidate like Mrs. Clinton. One question the Times reports shy from asking is a question about Mrs. Clinton's own baggage, which have been haunting her campaign from the beginning up till this moment, and what would happen to the baggage, if she becomes the president?
Many people believe that the answer is easy as one can get: The Times and other practitioners in the news media will continue their crusade for sanity amid rots, as it has been the case all these years without a change. The Clinton Dynasty would have succeeded its wholesale control of the Democratic Party and the Bush Dynasty would have a renewed strength to control the affairs of the Republican Party.
Right now, the Bush Dynasty's control of the Republican Party is under serious threat.with the rise of the Trump and the possibility that this Trump may shock the world with a victory unexpected by many of observers. Yet, many observers are doffing their hats for Trump's efforts and the length he has gone in this campaign, much that he has not been disgraced out of the race.
Mrs. Clinton had said it was a mistake that she used a private server as secretary of state. President had reiterated Clinton's utterance that Mrs. Clinton is bets to serve as president after 30 years in public service and that much ado is being made of her honest mistake for using a private server.
Aside from defending mrs. clinton, President Obama is one of among some politicians currently campaigning for Mrs. Clinton, in spite of the many baggages that surround her campaign. Observers are saying that it cannot be that President Obama is unaware of the many advisers of Mrs. Clinton currently under investigation, aside from Mrs. Clinton herself.
One separate question curious observer are asking is how President Obama could describe Mrs. Clinton's act of using a private server that was carefully put together and placed in the basement of a home far away from Washington by her officials in and out of the State Department, as honest mistake. They ask whether this a honest or deliberate mistake. They say whether it is a honest or deliberate mistake, it has been haunting her campaign. They say those she may have communicated with the private email and who are in a position to have advised her but have not, are not her friends, but adversaries posing as friends. They say if Mrs. Clinton had been advised by her so called friends to abandon the private server and she had not continued with the use before her exit form the state Department, she would not have all the troubles she is currently contending.
They say the private server is one bad issue one and undertaking as it has become clear to her, her admirers and foes alike, but that the issue of the Clinton Foundation and its operations around the world has become like a cobwell in which most of her campaign officials are caught seeming in a dragnet.
And for all that the world would like to know that has prodded a respectable newspaper like New York Times to ask a question about the baggage around her and what will become of the baggages if Mrs. Clinton becomes president, Mrs. Clinton has said that she will maintain the status quo. It shows how difficult getting a change can be in a corrupt society.
Many people are asking whether President Obama did not campaign for change, which they say he has failed to deliver and they wonder that the same president is today campaigning for the continuation of the status quo.Many observers say that Mrs. Clinton said she is campaigning to be the president of all, but that President Obama has proved more to belong to the Democratic party than belonging to all Americans.
People are saying that all these campaign rhetorics are political without substance and that it will continue as long as professional politicians are the only people with access to be president. It is a good development that the times has come to the realization why many american voters are in dilemma about what to do with this election. Will the country be like other Banana countries, where corruption is an acceptable culture?
Before the New York Times' news reports on Saturday, with a question whether if Clinton wins on Tuesday, if she will be going into the Oval Office with what has become a baggage to her campaign, many news reports have highlighted the number of her advisers currently under the FBI's investigation.
Observers say it is a curious question that a friend like the New York Times is in a position to ask a candidate like Mrs. Clinton. One question the Times reports shy from asking is a question about Mrs. Clinton's own baggage, which have been haunting her campaign from the beginning up till this moment, and what would happen to the baggage, if she becomes the president?
Many people believe that the answer is easy as one can get: The Times and other practitioners in the news media will continue their crusade for sanity amid rots, as it has been the case all these years without a change. The Clinton Dynasty would have succeeded its wholesale control of the Democratic Party and the Bush Dynasty would have a renewed strength to control the affairs of the Republican Party.
Right now, the Bush Dynasty's control of the Republican Party is under serious threat.with the rise of the Trump and the possibility that this Trump may shock the world with a victory unexpected by many of observers. Yet, many observers are doffing their hats for Trump's efforts and the length he has gone in this campaign, much that he has not been disgraced out of the race.
Mrs. Clinton had said it was a mistake that she used a private server as secretary of state. President had reiterated Clinton's utterance that Mrs. Clinton is bets to serve as president after 30 years in public service and that much ado is being made of her honest mistake for using a private server.
Aside from defending mrs. clinton, President Obama is one of among some politicians currently campaigning for Mrs. Clinton, in spite of the many baggages that surround her campaign. Observers are saying that it cannot be that President Obama is unaware of the many advisers of Mrs. Clinton currently under investigation, aside from Mrs. Clinton herself.
One separate question curious observer are asking is how President Obama could describe Mrs. Clinton's act of using a private server that was carefully put together and placed in the basement of a home far away from Washington by her officials in and out of the State Department, as honest mistake. They ask whether this a honest or deliberate mistake. They say whether it is a honest or deliberate mistake, it has been haunting her campaign. They say those she may have communicated with the private email and who are in a position to have advised her but have not, are not her friends, but adversaries posing as friends. They say if Mrs. Clinton had been advised by her so called friends to abandon the private server and she had not continued with the use before her exit form the state Department, she would not have all the troubles she is currently contending.
They say the private server is one bad issue one and undertaking as it has become clear to her, her admirers and foes alike, but that the issue of the Clinton Foundation and its operations around the world has become like a cobwell in which most of her campaign officials are caught seeming in a dragnet.
And for all that the world would like to know that has prodded a respectable newspaper like New York Times to ask a question about the baggage around her and what will become of the baggages if Mrs. Clinton becomes president, Mrs. Clinton has said that she will maintain the status quo. It shows how difficult getting a change can be in a corrupt society.
Many people are asking whether President Obama did not campaign for change, which they say he has failed to deliver and they wonder that the same president is today campaigning for the continuation of the status quo.Many observers say that Mrs. Clinton said she is campaigning to be the president of all, but that President Obama has proved more to belong to the Democratic party than belonging to all Americans.
People are saying that all these campaign rhetorics are political without substance and that it will continue as long as professional politicians are the only people with access to be president. It is a good development that the times has come to the realization why many american voters are in dilemma about what to do with this election. Will the country be like other Banana countries, where corruption is an acceptable culture?
