The Cankerworms Against Founding Fathers' Ideal
27 October 2024 By Abiodun Kareem Giwa
America's founding fathers did marvelous work ensuring a constitution beyond human manipulation. They would find out about efforts by zealous politicians to truncate the document for personal political gains. This development buttresses their seemingly endless discussion of human nature. Today, the demonstration of human nature is to cancel the filibuster in Congress to change the Supreme Court to suit their whims and caprices. The worst part of their plan is abolishing the Electoral College. These politicians are elected senators who should know better that the Senate's filibuster serves a purpose, and the Supreme Court is independent of the executive and Congress.
The separation of power between three arms of government was intentional to avoid what liberal politicians are working to achieve. It is a moral declaration of war against the Founding Fathers' philosophy. They will only stop when they have all the powers and no more things to abolish. Yet, they do not see themselves as the real danger to Democracy for their immoral failing at governance but point accusing fingers at their opponent who does not share their erroneous belief.
What would the Founding Fathers say about today's campaign rhetoric if they were alive? The simple answer is desperation for political power and domination. They would say it was why they went long to ensure no desperadoes gained power. The Founding Fathers had a strong reason for making the battleground states the role in the presidential election and not the city-states of New York and California. But politicians who are hell-bent on continuously seeing their party produce the president will do anything possible to achieve their selfish dream. They do not believe they are the cankerworms against Democracy.
Every president has a constitutional right to fill vacant positions in the Supreme Court when the opportunity arises. It is not an undemocratic norm, and no president can force the issue against the Constitution. Congress vets every Supreme Court justice nominee for confirmation, ensuring they are there to serve the country and not themselves. There is nothing yet to show that they serve themselves; they discuss issues to agree or disagree, and the majority decision is final. These politicians do not show disagreement with the court when decisions favor them. However, when the decision does not, they begin picketing to show one justice is a conservative or Republican representative or that a Democratic or Republican president nominated the justice.
The most egregious display of selfishness is their determination to kill the filibuster at all costs to pave the way for the reconstruction of the Supreme Court. They have made a political campaign issue because, according to them, they intend to take over the Supreme Court to ensure abortion rights. They do not care about the term of the baby aborted, but that the woman has the right to decide whether to carry the baby or not. It is not that they love the woman but to achieve a political gain. The woman loves to have children unless their lives are threatened. Ironically, some women go out of their way to do the inappropriate, forgetting that the aborted child also has a right to life. The Supreme Court's recent decision against Roe vs Wade opened the pandora box.
The first thing curious people learn in America is the picketing around abortion clinics that litter the environment. It means not all the people support abortion freedom that allows abortion clinics like a food department. It is a diverse society, not only for the liberals or the conservatives. The Supreme Court's decision ensures no federal abortion law forces any state to embrace unhindered abortion and that each state decides its abortion rights. But the liberals accuse former President Donald Trump of deliberately appointing three conservative justices to kill Roe and Wade. They forget the problem Americans have faced in the last four years is unhindered illegal migration, economic mismanagement resulting in unmitigated inflation, insecurity in major cities and suburbs swarmed by illegal migrants, and a foreign policy that has encouraged Iran against Israel, and the fear of a world war from the Ukraine and Russia entanglement.
These issues present a real danger to Democracy at home and abroad. President Joseph Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and her campaign surrogates must own up to what they represent by their utterances and plans against the filibuster, the Supreme Court, and the Electoral College. Instead, they should address issues about illegal migration, insecurity in cities nationwide, economic mismanagement, and inflation, which they caused by incompetence, rather than canceling the filibuster, turning the Supreme Court into a rubber stamp, and killing the Electoral College.
The separation of power between three arms of government was intentional to avoid what liberal politicians are working to achieve. It is a moral declaration of war against the Founding Fathers' philosophy. They will only stop when they have all the powers and no more things to abolish. Yet, they do not see themselves as the real danger to Democracy for their immoral failing at governance but point accusing fingers at their opponent who does not share their erroneous belief.
What would the Founding Fathers say about today's campaign rhetoric if they were alive? The simple answer is desperation for political power and domination. They would say it was why they went long to ensure no desperadoes gained power. The Founding Fathers had a strong reason for making the battleground states the role in the presidential election and not the city-states of New York and California. But politicians who are hell-bent on continuously seeing their party produce the president will do anything possible to achieve their selfish dream. They do not believe they are the cankerworms against Democracy.
Every president has a constitutional right to fill vacant positions in the Supreme Court when the opportunity arises. It is not an undemocratic norm, and no president can force the issue against the Constitution. Congress vets every Supreme Court justice nominee for confirmation, ensuring they are there to serve the country and not themselves. There is nothing yet to show that they serve themselves; they discuss issues to agree or disagree, and the majority decision is final. These politicians do not show disagreement with the court when decisions favor them. However, when the decision does not, they begin picketing to show one justice is a conservative or Republican representative or that a Democratic or Republican president nominated the justice.
The most egregious display of selfishness is their determination to kill the filibuster at all costs to pave the way for the reconstruction of the Supreme Court. They have made a political campaign issue because, according to them, they intend to take over the Supreme Court to ensure abortion rights. They do not care about the term of the baby aborted, but that the woman has the right to decide whether to carry the baby or not. It is not that they love the woman but to achieve a political gain. The woman loves to have children unless their lives are threatened. Ironically, some women go out of their way to do the inappropriate, forgetting that the aborted child also has a right to life. The Supreme Court's recent decision against Roe vs Wade opened the pandora box.
The first thing curious people learn in America is the picketing around abortion clinics that litter the environment. It means not all the people support abortion freedom that allows abortion clinics like a food department. It is a diverse society, not only for the liberals or the conservatives. The Supreme Court's decision ensures no federal abortion law forces any state to embrace unhindered abortion and that each state decides its abortion rights. But the liberals accuse former President Donald Trump of deliberately appointing three conservative justices to kill Roe and Wade. They forget the problem Americans have faced in the last four years is unhindered illegal migration, economic mismanagement resulting in unmitigated inflation, insecurity in major cities and suburbs swarmed by illegal migrants, and a foreign policy that has encouraged Iran against Israel, and the fear of a world war from the Ukraine and Russia entanglement.
These issues present a real danger to Democracy at home and abroad. President Joseph Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and her campaign surrogates must own up to what they represent by their utterances and plans against the filibuster, the Supreme Court, and the Electoral College. Instead, they should address issues about illegal migration, insecurity in cities nationwide, economic mismanagement, and inflation, which they caused by incompetence, rather than canceling the filibuster, turning the Supreme Court into a rubber stamp, and killing the Electoral College.
Widget is loading comments...