Najib Razak and the Malaysian Triangle
August 7 2015 By Abi Giwa
An aircraft disappeared from the air with entire passengers of 298 humans, and for over one year nothing was heard about it, until what appeared like one of the aircraft's wings washed ashore early in the week. The part was taken to France for confirmation amid speculations that the part could belong to MH370.
But before the aircraft's management could contact the relatives' of the passengers who went down with the aircraft, the Malaysian PM, Najib Razak, has gone on the air with a confirmation to the world. He said that the found part belongs to the missing aircraft.
What does this development reminds readers of of the PM one year ago? About one year ago, the same Malaysian PM went to the public that the aircraft ended its journey in the Indian Ocean. Of course, relatives of the passengers demanded accountability, asking the PM to convince that the aircraft actually ended its journey in the ocean.
Now that people are asking why the PM could have run into telling the public that the found wing belongs to the missing aircraft, the question arises a to why the PM didn't allow his Public Relations' team to do the work of informing the public. Why must it be him? Is it because he is the leader?
Undoubtedly, observers are saying Razak must have been living in regret for having been the person who announced about one year ago that the aircraft ended its journey in the ocean without an evidence. And now that a wing washed ashore, and it has been confirmed that the wing belongs to the missing aircraft, the natural tendency of 'I said so', may have displaced common sense in Razak and his team's resolution to break the news and confirm that what they made public last year that the aircraft ended its journey in the ocean was nothing but the truth.
Razak and his team would nit have expected the anger from passengers's reaction to be as troubling as it has turned out. The news has been reverberating of passengers asking Razak to produce their relatives who may have gone down with the missing aircraft. And Razak has adorned himself with the garb of the airline's chief executive, because the airline belongs to Malaysia, instead of allowing the airline's chief executive officer to do his work.
Despite the airline belonging to Malaysia, the airline has people who managed its operations. And it is the responsibility of the airline's managers to be responsible for every development in the management of the aircraft before and after the accident.
As long as the aircraft situation or whereabout has not been, the Malaysian airline managers owe the passengers's relatives the last say about the whereabout of the a
Passengers's on the that ill fated flight.
Many people believe that even if the airline's management has been disbanded due to the misfortune of what people now call the Malaysian Triangle,there ought to have remained a number of people on the airline the relatives of passengers can ask questions.
But before the aircraft's management could contact the relatives' of the passengers who went down with the aircraft, the Malaysian PM, Najib Razak, has gone on the air with a confirmation to the world. He said that the found part belongs to the missing aircraft.
What does this development reminds readers of of the PM one year ago? About one year ago, the same Malaysian PM went to the public that the aircraft ended its journey in the Indian Ocean. Of course, relatives of the passengers demanded accountability, asking the PM to convince that the aircraft actually ended its journey in the ocean.
Now that people are asking why the PM could have run into telling the public that the found wing belongs to the missing aircraft, the question arises a to why the PM didn't allow his Public Relations' team to do the work of informing the public. Why must it be him? Is it because he is the leader?
Undoubtedly, observers are saying Razak must have been living in regret for having been the person who announced about one year ago that the aircraft ended its journey in the ocean without an evidence. And now that a wing washed ashore, and it has been confirmed that the wing belongs to the missing aircraft, the natural tendency of 'I said so', may have displaced common sense in Razak and his team's resolution to break the news and confirm that what they made public last year that the aircraft ended its journey in the ocean was nothing but the truth.
Razak and his team would nit have expected the anger from passengers's reaction to be as troubling as it has turned out. The news has been reverberating of passengers asking Razak to produce their relatives who may have gone down with the missing aircraft. And Razak has adorned himself with the garb of the airline's chief executive, because the airline belongs to Malaysia, instead of allowing the airline's chief executive officer to do his work.
Despite the airline belonging to Malaysia, the airline has people who managed its operations. And it is the responsibility of the airline's managers to be responsible for every development in the management of the aircraft before and after the accident.
As long as the aircraft situation or whereabout has not been, the Malaysian airline managers owe the passengers's relatives the last say about the whereabout of the a
Passengers's on the that ill fated flight.
Many people believe that even if the airline's management has been disbanded due to the misfortune of what people now call the Malaysian Triangle,there ought to have remained a number of people on the airline the relatives of passengers can ask questions.
