Venezuela Triggers Swift's Modest Proposal Memory
3 March 2024 By Abiodun Kareem Giwa

Venezuela was once prosperous. But today, a country with abundant petroleum is on its knees, in political and economic travails. Nicholas Maduro is managing a country with oil shortages and not surplus. People are running away from the enclave. And where do they go other than the United States? Many are here giving a bad name to the country because of their names surfacing in crime scenes.
A Venezuelan allegedly killed a young woman jogging in a Georgia institution of higher learning. He entered the country through El Paso and left a wife in New York for a better job, but the woman is devastated by her man doing something awful. The story of Venezuelans riding scooters to commit crimes in the Big Apple is everywhere. Is it a case of the rotten apple spoiling the excellent apple?
Observers say not only Venezuelans cross through El Paso from South America to the U.S., why the mole on them and not others? The question brings to the surface unconfirmed information about how Venezuela opened its prisons for inmates to find their way to the U.S. Is the U.S. sure some Venezuelans here are not some of those released from prison? Again, police in New York are reportedly working to track some dare-devil cult members tied to Venezuela.
It is dangerous to stereotype all Venezuelans in the U.S. Many people from the South American country live in the U.S. when in rosier days and Americans benefit from the Citgo gas station belonging to Venezuela. It is always the case that condition impermanence makes people become the opposite of yesterday. Venezuela can claim its yesterday's glory. Some countries worldwide have never seen oil or any glory and need to know what it is to run out of money.
Misfortune is real, though no one likes it. Many of Williams Shakespeare's plays interchange between fortune and its opposite. People are gaining favor and losing it. People seek fortune but misfortune. Some people are good at conserving wealth, while others squander it. We live in a world where yesterday's less privileged buy the formerly wealthy's properties. Literature students would remember the story of a Russian billionaire family who lost all he had acquired to a former servant. It is about the impermanence of human conditions. The Irish people can tell a better story about misfortune based on their experience and the cause of Jonathan Swift's modest proposal.
Swift wrote A Modest Proposal as an eyewitness to parents' experience of using children as puns for lack of means to care for them. He then recommended a much harsher option to relieve parents and society of the burden of maintaining children in a challenging economic condition. We still live in an uncertain and unsettling world where the birth is ever-increasing against the death rate. People make love, and the result is pregnancy and babies. Liberal politicians approve of abortion against Conservative politicians' pro-life. Abortion approval is almost equivalent to killing babies before they are born. The only difference between Swift's recommendation and modern liberal politician pro-choice is that babies are killed before birth and are no discussion about buying them from their parents to be cooked and eaten by the barons. The transformation of life in Ireland after the tumultuous economic condition speaks of humans' survival ability.
Babies killed before or after birth serve the same purpose: to save their parents from the misery of caring for babies amid poverty and to help society conserve resources. Swift's option today would have people's stomachs turned. The Smart Alecs in politics reinvent the Swift elimination safe the other side of it about selling them to the rich and preparing them in a stew for the barons. Venezuelans would wish compatriots tarnishing their country's image in the U.S. were never born. Some would hold Maduro responsible for allowing opening the prison and allowing criminals go abroad with the country's identity. At the same time, Americans are cursing Joesph Biden for opening the gate for unchecked entry at the border.
A Venezuelan allegedly killed a young woman jogging in a Georgia institution of higher learning. He entered the country through El Paso and left a wife in New York for a better job, but the woman is devastated by her man doing something awful. The story of Venezuelans riding scooters to commit crimes in the Big Apple is everywhere. Is it a case of the rotten apple spoiling the excellent apple?
Observers say not only Venezuelans cross through El Paso from South America to the U.S., why the mole on them and not others? The question brings to the surface unconfirmed information about how Venezuela opened its prisons for inmates to find their way to the U.S. Is the U.S. sure some Venezuelans here are not some of those released from prison? Again, police in New York are reportedly working to track some dare-devil cult members tied to Venezuela.
It is dangerous to stereotype all Venezuelans in the U.S. Many people from the South American country live in the U.S. when in rosier days and Americans benefit from the Citgo gas station belonging to Venezuela. It is always the case that condition impermanence makes people become the opposite of yesterday. Venezuela can claim its yesterday's glory. Some countries worldwide have never seen oil or any glory and need to know what it is to run out of money.
Misfortune is real, though no one likes it. Many of Williams Shakespeare's plays interchange between fortune and its opposite. People are gaining favor and losing it. People seek fortune but misfortune. Some people are good at conserving wealth, while others squander it. We live in a world where yesterday's less privileged buy the formerly wealthy's properties. Literature students would remember the story of a Russian billionaire family who lost all he had acquired to a former servant. It is about the impermanence of human conditions. The Irish people can tell a better story about misfortune based on their experience and the cause of Jonathan Swift's modest proposal.
Swift wrote A Modest Proposal as an eyewitness to parents' experience of using children as puns for lack of means to care for them. He then recommended a much harsher option to relieve parents and society of the burden of maintaining children in a challenging economic condition. We still live in an uncertain and unsettling world where the birth is ever-increasing against the death rate. People make love, and the result is pregnancy and babies. Liberal politicians approve of abortion against Conservative politicians' pro-life. Abortion approval is almost equivalent to killing babies before they are born. The only difference between Swift's recommendation and modern liberal politician pro-choice is that babies are killed before birth and are no discussion about buying them from their parents to be cooked and eaten by the barons. The transformation of life in Ireland after the tumultuous economic condition speaks of humans' survival ability.
Babies killed before or after birth serve the same purpose: to save their parents from the misery of caring for babies amid poverty and to help society conserve resources. Swift's option today would have people's stomachs turned. The Smart Alecs in politics reinvent the Swift elimination safe the other side of it about selling them to the rich and preparing them in a stew for the barons. Venezuelans would wish compatriots tarnishing their country's image in the U.S. were never born. Some would hold Maduro responsible for allowing opening the prison and allowing criminals go abroad with the country's identity. At the same time, Americans are cursing Joesph Biden for opening the gate for unchecked entry at the border.
Widget is loading comments...